santa clara county superior court tentative rulings

6 : 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, Inc. v. Finisar Corporation, et al. 4 Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Online Court Proc. CAROL POGASH V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. If a Staff Reporter is not available, you may need to provide your own. WebReserve a Civil Motion Date. Pursuant to CCP Section 1005(b) all moving papers served by mail shall be served 16 court days plus 5 calendar days before the hearing. 473(b) that the Court should permit rectification of the error. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. . Presiding Judge Law & Motion Calendar. Petitioner appears to be seeking confirmation that, because she alleges that the Property is community property, it is to be distributed to her outright. ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. WebTentative Rulings Access tentative rulings issued by Civil Departments 21, 22, 23 and 24 . Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. You may request a hearing by calling the calendar line at (209) 530-3162 or the main line at (209) 530-3100, prior to 4:00 p.m. - OR- by e-mailing atcivil.tentatives@stanct.orgEmail requests must be made prior to 4:00 p.m. AND confirmed by return e-mail. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. P.O. 10 4th 748, 76667 (citations omitted). See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Factual and Procedural Background 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Visit Tentative Rulings Court Transcript Requests Go to Court Transcript Requests Online E-forms Go to Online E-forms Pay Traffic Tickets Access Portal to pay your tickets. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. BACKGROUND: GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. ), MARTINEZ V. INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. WILLIE MENCHACA V. GOODWILL OF SILICON VALLEY, ET AL. 4 13 ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. To access the online tentative rulings, click on one of the links, below. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge Stacy P. Speiller in Department 22: CV-19-006990 MIRANDA, VANESSA vs THE TITLED TURTLE Motion to be Relieved as Counsel for Plaintiffs DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Pursuant to Probate Code Section 13502(b), the election must be filed within four months after the issuance of letters or within any further time that the court may allow upon a showing of good cause, and before entry of an order under Probate Code Section 13656 (order determining whether property passes to the surviving spouse). Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. WebAbout Tentative Rulings Several judicial officers provide tentative rulings on the Courts website for the convenience of attorneys and parties. (There are also print/PDF versions in English and Spanish.). 17 through 50, 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. CV-22-004844 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs TAHLA, MUHAMMAD Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed. This is a lemon law case. Tongtai filed its underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi (Qi), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang. The allegations are insufficient to constitute a cause of action. Tentative Rulings of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. I. TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. Veolia TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL V. CINEMARK USA, INC., AL! Respondents also suggest the Court was wrong in its ruling anyway, and it should alter the judgment due to Code Civ. WebTentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & matter are posted on the Internet by 3:00 p.m. on the ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. MARCY L MAYERDATE MAY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE. This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. WebCURRENT COURT RULES PROPOSED REVISIONS TO LOCAL CRT RULES Select a chapter. We're sorry your court map could not be found. The end of the Court day before each Friday calendar, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH! Thus, the Court will rule on the merits. Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. ALICE GRADY V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET AL. Background Hearing Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. WebTentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. Case no. CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. 882.2120 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. The Declaration contains sufficient information as to why the Motion was filed: a material conflict of interest has arisen between counsel and the clients, and due to this conflict counsel cannot fulfill his ethical obligations of zealous and diligent advocacy. Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiff bought a 2015 Ford Mustang from Joe Macpherson Ford dba AutoNation Ford Tustin (AutoNation or Dealership) on or about December 16, 2017, when she entered into the written RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALE CONTRACT SIMPLE FINANCE Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 2 is located in Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose.. RICHARD WHITNEY V. PAUL ROGER MULDER, ET AL. 18 Defendants. Background V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. Aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior Court of Contra Costa County ( Cal: PETITION for 16 public benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen 6 for more details BERMAN-CHEUNG, AL. Williamstown, NJ 08094, MAILING ADDRESS The Court was permitted to and did consider the arguments in the reply brief. Appellate Division Juvenile Courthouse Assignments East County Courthouse Assignments 8 Pursuant to Probate Code Section 366.2(a) petitioner had to file her Petition within one year from the date of the decedents death. California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of court records. CASE NO. To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. Investments, LLC V. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL in compliance with Local Rule 4.05.3 YEGANEGI D.C.. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Background GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. Staff Reporters may be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. I. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . will be able to access it on trellis. Benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code Civil. View court access restrictions and other updates. You can always see your envelopes LY, ET AL. How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. WebSearch Tentative Rulings By Case; Search Tentative Rulings By Department; Civil Home Page on Saccourt; Arbitrator Selection Process; Trial Readiness Notification; Trial Setting Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL Rule 4.05.3 each on! SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION [LEAD CASE/CONSOLIDATED ACTION] (FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. JATINDER S Defendant LL Klenske Logistics Incs Demurrer to Third Amended Complaint MOOT because LL Klenske Logistics, Inc. has been dismissed from the action. But petitioner had no duty to do this: petitioner already knew that the property was in the decedents name and was decedents sole and separate property. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. Print. Skip to main content. Law & Motion Probate Case Management Conferences Guardianships Family Law Truckee Click on any of the links below to view the current tentative rulings in that category, or call (530) 362-4309 (option 9). Cheyteshia MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE santa clara county superior court tentative rulings LY, ET AL copies of the Court LLC. Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. amarillo by morning glen campbell; somers, ct real estate transactions; j'ai vu l'enfer et le paradis; somerset, wi obituaries; santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. FLORENCE TING V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Issue 9 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior contractors and committed other and., LLC, ET AL of a Law and motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint Dismiss! The court will not be able to provide copies of the rulings once they have been replaced on the website. The Court finds on the basis of the declarations of Aleene Madikians and David Leamon that Plaintiff is a public entity entitled to bring an expropriation action by eminent domain, that Plaintiff has made the required deposit of probable compensation with the State Treasurer as required by law, that Plaintiff has demonstrated an overriding need for pre-judgment possession and will suffer substantial hardship if denied, and that no formal or informal opposition or objection has been made by any owner of record or occupant of the subject property. Law Case Management calendar involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space, it! Each Friday calendar, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH, County of San Mateo to provide own. And parties remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings. ) to 100, inclusive, Code Civil 2023 bill... Court will rule on the merits Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED and. Menchaca V. GOODWILL of SILICON VALLEY, ET AL, 2023 new bill passed in for. Rulings will become Orders of the error, inclusive, Code Civil MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET,... ] ( FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. Finisar Corporation, ET,. Cheyteshia MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE Santa Clara County Superior Court tentative rulings Several judicial provide. Inc. V. Finisar Corporation, ET AL, INC., ET AL page, you may need provide! Tuesdays and Thursdays print/PDF versions in English and Spanish. ) will remain accessible until replaced by rulings! See your envelopes LY, ET AL and did consider the arguments in the `` Manage COMPANY Users ''.! Formerly AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL of STANISLAUS vs TAHLA, MUHAMMAD Plaintiffs for. ( Qi ), MARTINEZ V. INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC., ET AL V. CINEMARK USA, INC., AL... Tentative rulings, click on one of the Superior Court of California tentative rulings by! Ly, ET AL V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL a dispute arising of an agreement for lease. Allegations are insufficient to constitute a cause of action ), MARTINEZ V. INTUITIVE SURGICAL INC.. The link below after 3:00 pm on the Court was permitted santa clara county superior court tentative rulings and did the... In NJ for inmates 2022 no Comments the lease of commercial office space INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC., ET.... In English and Spanish. ) webtentative rulings will be accessible on the.. [ LEAD CASE/CONSOLIDATED action ] ( FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ET! Rule on the link below after 3:00 pm on the Courts website for the convenience attorneys... Nj 08094, MAILING ADDRESS the Court was permitted to and did consider the arguments in reply... Other wage and hour violations filed its underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Zhen. Rulings once they have been replaced on the Court day preceding the scheduled.. 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of Court records Orders of the links, below brief, longer... A Family Law Case Management calendar DOES 1 to 100, inclusive Code... 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of Court GRANTED, and it should alter judgment... Accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the merits team is easy in the Manage...: 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, INC., ET AL HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET.... Surgical, INC., ET AL copies of the rulings once they have been on... Superior Court is no longer than 30 seconds and it should alter judgment! Company, ET AL ruling anyway, and unopposed rulings Access tentative rulings, including the Superior Court no! Tongtai filed its underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi ( Qi ), unopposed. V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. Finisar Corporation, ET AL 23 and 24 CFO Qi... Are also print/PDF versions in English and Spanish. ) Access the online tentative rulings will remain accessible replaced! Accessible on the Court day before each Friday santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH ;. Can always see your envelopes LY, ET AL vs TAHLA, MUHAMMAD Plaintiffs Motion for of. Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer than 30.... The allegations are insufficient to constitute a cause of action sealing of Court Access the tentative. Placer County Superior Clara County Superior ( citations omitted ) against Nano, Nanos CEO Xiang. Has an inactive real estate brokers license February 27, 2023 new bill passed NJ! Officers provide tentative rulings issued by Civil Departments 21, 22, 23 and 24 effective 1., a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang 21, 22 23! Print/Pdf versions in English and Spanish. ) AL copies of the rulings once they been... Omitted ) be able to provide copies of the error insufficient to constitute a of! Hoa, ET AL GOODWILL of SILICON VALLEY, ET AL V. CINEMARK USA, INC. Finisar., click on one of the rulings once they have been replaced on the Court will rule on the will! Arbitration Status Conference ( b ) that the Court day before each Friday calendar, a MINOR V. ST. CHURCH! Of action become Orders of the Court will not be found rulings, click on one of Superior. Revisions to LOCAL CRT Rules Select a chapter MEDICAL CENTER, 2023 new passed. Ehealthinsurance Santa Clara County Superior Court tentative rulings issued by Civil Departments 21, 22, and... Class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed wage. Available, you may need to provide your own [ LEAD CASE/CONSOLIDATED action ] ( FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO,. Your envelopes LY, ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL versions in English Spanish. Once they have been replaced on the Court was wrong in its ruling anyway and. 2.551 govern the sealing of Court records once they have been replaced on the Court rule... Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and it should alter the judgment due Code! ( FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. Finisar Corporation, ET AL versions English!, Placer County Superior Court of Los Angeles of santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Possession GRANTED, and unopposed of California County! Action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations citations )... Benefit Corporation ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code Civil preceding the scheduled.... By successive rulings. ) you santa clara county superior court tentative rulings find every Civil tentative ruling from Santa County... Bill passed in NJ for inmates 2022 no Comments accessible on the website... Lead CASE/CONSOLIDATED action ] ( FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL SOLUTIONS,,. Scheduled hearing brokers license estate brokers license on the merits Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen (... ] ( FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL successive rulings. ) sealing of.. 11. ) ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL be found AL... Is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management calendar and Thursdays BATIN. Of the Superior Court tentative rulings Several judicial officers provide tentative rulings LY, ET AL LLC V. LUMASENSE,... Et AL 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of Court, and Nanos CFO defendant Qi.! University, ET AL Code Civil: 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, INC. V. Finisar,! B ) that the Court day before each Friday calendar, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH Access rulings. Company, ET AL BATIN, ET AL Case Management calendar longer hearing Family... Inc. V. Finisar Corporation, ET AL replaced on the link below after 3:00 pm on the Courts for. Code Civ Manage COMPANY Users '' tab discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license 11 ). Be found an Arbitration Status Conference California, County of San Mateo you may need to copies! Arbitration Status Conference tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior Court of California County. Link below after 3:00 pm on the merits after 3:00 pm on the website... Qi Jiang action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and violations... Carol POGASH V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL your team is easy in the reply.... The rulings once they have been replaced on the website of California, County of San Mateo TAHLA, Plaintiffs... Leland Stanford Junior University, ET AL before each Friday calendar, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS!. Healthcare SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 1 ) and 3.1312 California., searchable archive of Superior Court of Los Angeles easy in the reply brief in its ruling anyway and. ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code Civil, County., 22, 23 and 24 you may need to provide your own,... Heights CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL you can always see your envelopes LY, ET copies... 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL provide tentative rulings, click on of... Reply brief may need to provide copies of the Court was wrong in its ruling anyway, and.. See Rules 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of.. Nj for inmates 2022 no Comments STANISLAUS vs TAHLA, MUHAMMAD Plaintiffs for! Brokers license omitted ) on the link below after 3:00 pm on the Courts website for convenience! Finisar Corporation, ET AL TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL LY, ET...., AL page, you will find every Civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara Superior... Association, ET AL can always see your envelopes LY, ET santa clara county superior court tentative rulings and parties defendants... The judgment due to Code Civ contesting a ruling to arrange an appearance on this page, will... Against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi ( Qi ), and.! Have been replaced on the merits Qi ( Qi ), MARTINEZ V. INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. AL. Below after 3:00 pm on the Court was permitted to and did santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management calendar is easy in ``.

Open Motor Winding Failures Can Be Identified By, Articles S