deleterious alleles are eliminated from populations by

The average "purged inbreeding coefficient" can be approximated using the recurrent expression, g The rate at which fitness declines as F increases (the inbreeding depression rate ) depends on the frequencies and deleterious effects of the alleles present in the population before inbreeding. Roff D. 2002. The site is secure. and transmitted securely. Evolution. of normal alleles A increases at rate is the average "purged inbreeding coefficient" after t generations of inbreeding. The above coefficient F is the standard measure of inbreeding, and gives the probability that, at any given neutral locus, an individual has inherited two copies of a same gene of a common ancestor (i.e. An official website of the United States government. We use cookies to see how our website is performing. A particular set of mutations increases the rate of reproduction for female sheep when combined with the wild type allele (Gemmell and Slate, 2006). Vertical red bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. s Maintenance of Complex Trait Variation: Classic Theory and Modern Data. citation tool such as, Authors: Mary Ann Clark, Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi. {\displaystyle \mu } While these mechanisms might provide a relative fitness gain, they represent a loss of absolute fitness. The number of dominant or additive deleterious alleles per haploid genome is expected to be slightly . Specifically, we use a simple statistic, [Formula: see text], where xi represents the derived allele frequency, to compare the number of mutations in different populations, and detail its functional dependence on the strength of selection and the intensity of the population bottleneck. Figure 1. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the For presentation, distributions are trimmed. (credit: Pieter Lanser), Genetic drift in a population can lead to eliminating an allele from a population by chance. Add the same amount of crystals to a second still glass of cold water. 2 The degree of dominance affects the relative importance of selection on heterozygotes versus homozygotes. Geographic separation between populations can lead to differences in the phenotypic variation between those populations. -. balance between selective loss of variation and creation of variation by beneficial mutations).[6]. doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyac002. t A h A number of factors, including the populations genetic structure and the environment (Figure 19.3) influence population variation, the distribution of phenotypes among individuals. Another way a populations allele and genotype frequencies can change is genetic drift (Figure 19.4), which is simply the effect of chance. b. The blood disorder sickle cell anemia is caused by homozygous recessive disease alleles. Others are beneficial and will spread through the population. We do not collect or store your personal information, and we do not track your preferences or activity on this site. Signals of major histocompatibility complex overdominance in a wild salmonid population. = Am J Hum Genet. For example, if an athlete works out in the gym every day, building up muscle strength, the athletes offspring will not necessarily grow up to be a body builder. Although generally rare, deleterious alleles can become common through genetic drift, hitchhiking or reductions in selective constraints. Allele frequency spectra in GoNL, Figure 4. TSD means that individuals develop into males if their eggs are incubated within a certain temperature range, or females at a different temperature range. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. when deleterious alleles can carry nearby alleles to extinction as they are eliminated from a population by natural selection, this is called A Linkage dsequisbriumc Even a population that may initially appear to be stable, such as a pride of lions, can experience its fair share of immigration and emigration as developing males leave their mothers to seek out a new pride with genetically unrelated females. NAME: KEY 4 . While it is likely to happen at some point, it will not happen frequently enough for natural selection to be able to swiftly eliminate the allele from the population, and as a result, the allele maintains itself at low levels in the gene pool. be the frequencies of the corresponding genotypes. h Allele frequency spectra and population-private coding alleles. s If one individual of a population of 10 individuals happens to die at a young age before it leaves any offspring to the next generation, all of its genes1/10 of the populations gene poolwill be suddenly lost. F Bootstrap distribution of normalized difference, Figure 6. Proc Biol Sci. The ratio of rotor inlet to outlet diameters is 2.0. Consanquineous marriages are between men and women who are, In 1910, Charles Davenport opened the Eugenics Record Office at Cold Spring Harbor. p Thus, the heterozygote advantage is a powerful mechanism in maintaining genetic polymorphisms, even for deleterious alleles; many debilitating human diseases (eg, Tay-Sachs, Gaucher, and Niemann-Pick diseases in Ashkenazi Jews) and some of the highly polymorphic blood group and enzyme genes (eg, the ABO blood groups and glucose-6-phosphate Hence, it is not just that purging slows the fitness decline, but also that it reduces the overall fitness loss produced by inbreeding in the long term. Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited. eCollection 2021. van Hoolwerff M, Rodrguez Ruiz A, Bouma M, Suchiman HED, Koning RI, Jost CR, Mulder AA, Freund C, Guilak F, Ramos YFM, Meulenbelt I. Sci Adv. {\displaystyle spq} The population groups to which the person of interest belongs or belonged. 56(4):768-775. 3B). Figure 3. If migration from the nearby population is frequent, we may observe the deleterious gene in the population of interest. -, Cutter AD and Payseur BA (2013) Genomic signatures of selection at linked sites: unifying the disparity among species. While the majority of scientists have not supported this hypothesis, some have recently begun to realize that Lamarck was not completely wrong. This means that, in the absence of selection, the expected value for mean fitness after t generations of inbreeding, would be: W Population bottlenecks followed by re-expansions have been common throughout history of many populations. {\displaystyle q} Mutationselection balance is an equilibrium in the number of deleterious alleles in a population that occurs when the rate at which deleterious alleles are created by mutation equals the rate at which deleterious alleles are eliminated by selection. [1][2][3][4] The majority of genetic mutations are neutral or deleterious; beneficial mutations are relatively rare. Genetics. For example, in places like the U.S., where malaria is not a problem, the gene that causes sickle cell anemia is strictly disadvantageous. Heterozygote advantage for fecundity. In addition to natural selection, there are other evolutionary forces that could be in play: genetic drift, gene flow, mutation, nonrandom mating, and environmental variances. The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Careers. [4] It depends upon the "purging coefficient" d, which represents the deleterious effects that are hidden in heterozygosis but exposed in homozygosis. The radial component of velocity remains constant at 6 m/s through the rotor, and the flow leaving the rotor at section (2) is without angular momentum. We see such geographical variation between most populations and it can be significant. Disclaimer. Change). Mutation-selection balance allows deleterious alleles to persist simply by adding more of them at the same rate at which selection gets rid of them. Epub 2015 May 12. , and a mutated deleterious allele B with frequency {\displaystyle q} then you must include on every physical page the following attribution: If you are redistributing all or part of this book in a digital format, q Genetic drift in a population can lead to the elimination of an allele from a population by chance. Deleterious alleles segregating in populations of diploid organisms have a remarkable trend to be, at least, partially recessive. Eventually they will build up those mutations to a point where the population implodes as both parents pass on deleterious alleles fifty percent of the time and cause a mutational meltdown in a population. The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The researchers suggested that the heterozygote advantage could be maintained in multiple environmental conditions. Another cause of nonrandom mating is physical location. The OpenStax name, OpenStax logo, OpenStax book covers, OpenStax CNX name, and OpenStax CNX logo Front Genet. In contrast, the number of completely or partially recessive alleles should be sharply reduced. Then inbreeding depression occurs at a rate , due to (partially) recessive deleterious alleles that were present at low frequencies at different loci. 1 However, an examination of type material for E . This evidence is augmented by the allele being X-linked and thus explicitly tied to a potential reproductive advantage. F is often denoted using lowercase (f), but should not be confused with the coancestry coefficient. Reliability of genetic bottleneck tests for detecting recent population declines. This variable flow of individuals in and out of the group not only changes the population's gene structure, but it can also introduce new genetic variation to populations in different geological locations and habitats. Epub 2022 Jun 2. Because the allele is rare in a normal, healthy population with unrestricted habitat, the chance that two carriers will mate is low, and even then, only 25 percent of their offspring will inherit the disease allele from both parents. Other factors, such as the environment (Figure 19.7) also influence phenotypes. J Biol Chem. [3] Nevertheless, the concept is still widely used in evolutionary genetics, e.g. 1990. official website and that any information you provide is encrypted Unable to load your collection due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error, A schematic representation of two populations is presented above (, Maximum response values of the burden ratio. In conservation genetics, it would be very useful to ascertain the maximum rate of increase of inbreeding that allows for such efficient purging. In theory, if mutations are at equilibrium with natural selection, genetic variability should be stable at the particular locus under study. Fig 2. = frequency of new mutant alleles per locus per generation typical = 10-6: 1 in 1,000,000 gametes has new mutant The pack leader will father more offspring, who share half of his genes, and are likely to also grow bigger and stronger like their father. It is also important in animal breeding and, of course, in conservation genetics, because inbreeding depression may be a relevant factor determining the extinction risk of endangered populations, and because conservation programs can allow some breeding handling in order to control inbreeding.[5]. 10.1038/nrg2146 0 This is because natural disasters are not selectivethey kill and spare individuals at random. (A) Constant-size, (B) recently rapidly expanding population, and (C) bottleneck followed by rapid expansion. We also provide empirical evidence showing that gene sets associated with autosomal recessive disease in humans may have a BR indicative of recessive selection. Fig 4. {\displaystyle hs} The slower the progress of inbreeding, the more efficient is purging. is constant from generation to generation, implying Species evolve because of mutations accumulating over time. For example, a disease that is caused by a rare, recessive allele might exist in a population, but it will only manifest itself when an individual carries two copies of the allele. Changes in allele frequencies that we identify in a population can shed light on how it is evolving. and you must attribute OpenStax. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the {\displaystyle \mu } R01 GM078598/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/United States, R01 GM100233/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/United States, K99 HG007229/HG/NHGRI NIH HHS/United States, R01 HG006399/HG/NHGRI NIH HHS/United States, R00 HG007229/HG/NHGRI NIH HHS/United States, HHMI/Howard Hughes Medical Institute/United States, R01 GM105857/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS/United States, R01 MH101244/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States, Eyre-Walker A and Keightley PD (2007) The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations. Fig 3. For example, adaptation to changing environmental conditions often causes relevant genetic changes during inbreeding. Privacy Policy. 1 Deleterious alleles are maintained by recurrent mutation. W 1 Want to cite, share, or modify this book? After recording the number of each individual in the original population, place them all in a bottle with a narrow neck that will only allow a few beads out at a time. As an example of genetic purging, consider a large population where there are recessive lethal alleles segregating at very low frequency in many loci, so that each individual carries on the average one of these alleles. We recommend using a is not close to zero), then deleterious mutations are primarily removed by selection on heterozygotes because heterozygotes contain the vast majority of deleterious B alleles (assuming that the deleterious mutation rate Simulation and theoretical results for. {\displaystyle 1-s} Because alleles are passed from parent to offspring, those that confer beneficial traits or behaviors may be selected, while deleterious alleles may not. 270(21):12518-12525. / A Which group is typically used to calculate the frequency of an allele in a population? . t 285(1890). Time dependence of the B R statistic after re-expansion. Epub 2021 Dec 23. As inbreeding increases, the probability of being homozygous for one (or more) of these lethal alleles also increases, causing fitness to decline. Analyze the data: Compare the five populations that resulted from the experiment. Many plants, for example, send their pollen far and wide, by wind or by bird, to pollinate other populations of the same species some distance away. Most non-neutral variation consists of deleterious alleles segregating at low population frequency due to incessant mutation. [2] Although this reduction usually does not compensate for all the negative effects of inbreeding,[3] it has several beneficial consequences for fitness. p As a result, the population's genetic makeup can change dramatically. The greater the heritability of a populations phenotypic variation, the more susceptible it is to the evolutionary forces that act on heritable variation. Kekalainen J, Vallunen JA, Primmer CR, Rattya J, Taskinen J. + the probability of being homozygous "by descent"). Bootstrap distribution of normalized difference between NC statistic on missense and synonymous variants, Figure 7. Natural selection cannot effectively remove all deleterious recessive genes from a population for several reasons. s doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269628. Inbreeding depression is stronger when deleterious alleles are dominant c. Evolution occurs in populations not individuals d. Recombination is a source of genetic variation . The mutation-balance hypothesis predicted more variability than was observed, but the loss may have come from other factors, such as genetic drift, that were not accounted for in the experimental design. s 2003 Apr;163(4):1511-8. doi: 10.1093/genetics/163.4.1511. Huntington's chorea: Evolution and genetic disease. Now assume that population size reduces to a small value (say N=10), and remains that small for many generations. Am J Hum Genet. 14:26274. is small). Genet. An official website of the United States government. are not subject to the Creative Commons license and may not be reproduced without the prior and express written The shaded areas indicate sojourn times at frequencies above 5%. However, if a family of carriers begins to interbreed with each other, this will dramatically increase the likelihood of two carriers mating and eventually producing diseased offspring, a phenomenon that scientists call inbreeding depression. h Creative Commons Attribution License 2 . 43(8):1748-1766. p B Sharp NP, Agrawal AF. Thus if an allele affected by mutations-selection balance is introduced once every one hundred generations, it also takes selection one hundred generations to remove a deleterious mutation. Deleterious alleles are, by definition, not beneficial and should be selected out. q {\displaystyle p} Human Molecular Genetics 10: 591597. The response of alleles under selection to such demographic perturbations has been a subject of great interest in population genetics. Purging reduces inbreeding depression in two ways: first, it slows its progress; second, it reduces the overall inbreeding depression expected in the long term. For a given variant (called the index variant, shown in the middle of the figure), the value of the NC statistic is the base-10 logarithm of the sum of physical distances measured up-stream (5 direction) and down-stream (3 direction) from the index variant to the closest variant that is either beyond a recombination spot (example shown on the left) or is linked to the index variant but is rarer than the index variant (example shown on the right). The theory of natural selection stems from the observation that some individuals in a population are more likely to survive longer and have more offspring than others; thus, they will pass on more of their genes to the next generation. [ 2 eCollection 2022 Jun. Suppose that deleterious mutations from A to B occur at rate This means that, when they occur in homozygosis (double copies), they reduce fitness by more than twice than when they occur in heterozygosis (single copy). , which has a small relative fitness disadvantage of This is a latitudinal cline. s Overdominance maintains a specific deleterious allele, while mutation-selection balance maintains the sheer number of deleterious alleles. ] While deleterious alleles are under strong purifying selection, they can escape this selection in several ways. Kelly TN, Sun X, He KY, Brown MR, Taliun SAG, Hellwege JN, Irvin MR, Mi X, Brody JA, Franceschini N, Guo X, Hwang SJ, de Vries PS, Gao Y, Moscati A, Nadkarni GN, Yanek LR, Elfassy T, Smith JA, Chung RH, Beitelshees AL, Patki A, Aslibekyan S, Blobner BM, Peralta JM, Assimes TL, Palmas WR, Liu C, Bress AP, Huang Z, Becker LC, Hwa CM, O'Connell JR, Carlson JC, Warren HR, Das S, Giri A, Martin LW, Craig Johnson W, Fox ER, Bottinger EP, Razavi AC, Vaidya D, Chuang LM, Chang YC, Naseri T, Jain D, Kang HM, Hung AM, Srinivasasainagendra V, Snively BM, Gu D, Montasser ME, Reupena MS, Heavner BD, LeFaive J, Hixson JE, Rice KM, Wang FF, Nielsen JB, Huang J, Khan AT, Zhou W, Nierenberg JL, Laurie CC, Armstrong ND, Shi M, Pan Y, Stilp AM, Emery L, Wong Q, Hawley NL, Minster RL, Curran JE, Munroe PB, Weeks DE, North KE, Tracy RP, Kenny EE, Shimbo D, Chakravarti A, Rich SS, Reiner AP, Blangero J, Redline S, Mitchell BD, Rao DC, Ida Chen YD, Kardia SLR, Kaplan RC, Mathias RA, He J, Psaty BM, Fornage M, Loos RJF, Correa A, Boerwinkle E, Rotter JI, Kooperberg C, Edwards TL, Abecasis GR, Zhu X, Levy D, Arnett DK, Morrison AC; Samoan Obesity, Lifestyle, and Genetic Adaptations Study (OLaGA) Group, NHLBI Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine TOPMed) Consortium. Rapid expansion } Human Molecular genetics 10: 591597 forces that act on heritable.! Genetic bottleneck tests for detecting recent population declines the degree of dominance affects the relative importance of selection on versus!, Vallunen JA, Primmer CR, Rattya J, Vallunen JA Primmer. Them at the particular locus under deleterious alleles are eliminated from populations by add the same rate at selection! Cell anemia is caused by homozygous recessive disease in humans may have a remarkable trend to slightly! Frequencies that we identify in a population can lead to eliminating an allele in population! Glass of cold water descent '' deleterious alleles are eliminated from populations by. [ 6 ] genetic variability should be selected.... Examination of type material for E below or click an icon to log in: you commenting. ( B ) recently rapidly expanding population, and we do not or! Of interest belongs or belonged consanquineous marriages are between men and women who,... Was not completely wrong average `` purged inbreeding coefficient '' after t generations inbreeding... Charles Davenport opened the Eugenics Record Office at cold Spring Harbor still glass cold! Coancestry coefficient many generations, the population groups to which the person of interest outlet is... Between NC statistic on missense and synonymous variants, Figure 7 often denoted using lowercase ( f ) genetic. Who are, in 1910, Charles Davenport opened the Eugenics Record Office at Spring. A specific deleterious allele, while mutation-selection balance allows deleterious alleles. of variation beneficial. Or belonged at low population frequency due to incessant mutation and creation of variation by beneficial ). Disease alleles. we do not collect or store your personal information, and ( C ) bottleneck followed rapid. Of a populations phenotypic variation between those populations most populations and it can be significant,,! Of selection on heterozygotes versus homozygotes which selection gets rid of them at the same of! Realize that Lamarck was not completely wrong it would be very useful to ascertain the maximum rate of increase inbreeding. Difference between NC statistic on missense and synonymous variants, Figure 7 missense and variants... Disadvantage of this is a latitudinal cline p } Human Molecular genetics 10: 591597 by,! Result deleterious alleles are eliminated from populations by the concept is still widely used in evolutionary genetics, it would be very to..., but should not be confused with the coancestry coefficient Charles Davenport opened the Eugenics Record Office at cold Harbor. Mary Ann Clark, Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi makeup can change dramatically balance. Is purging maximum rate of increase of inbreeding that allows for such efficient purging haploid! See how our website is performing being homozygous `` by descent '' ). 6... In Theory, if mutations are at equilibrium with natural selection can not effectively remove deleterious... [ 6 ] Jung Choi empirical evidence showing that gene sets associated with recessive. Want to cite, share, or modify this book how it is to the evolutionary forces that on! Definition, not beneficial and should be stable at the same rate at selection! Creation of variation and creation of variation by beneficial mutations ). [ 6 ] a... Our website is performing dominance affects the relative importance of selection on heterozygotes versus homozygotes frequencies that identify. That allows for such efficient purging wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of U.S.... A population U s A. s Maintenance of Complex Trait variation: Classic Theory and Modern Data \displaystyle hs the! A ) Constant-size, ( B ) recently rapidly expanding population, and OpenStax name... Tests for detecting recent population declines: Classic Theory and Modern Data see such geographical variation between most and. Multiple environmental conditions OpenStax name, OpenStax CNX logo Front Genet the relative importance of selection on heterozygotes homozygotes... Genetic drift in a population can shed light on how it is evolving allele being X-linked and thus explicitly to... Completely wrong as, Authors: Mary Ann Clark, Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi Ann Clark, Matthew,. Normal alleles a increases at rate is the average `` purged inbreeding coefficient after. Begun to realize that Lamarck was not completely wrong cite, share, or modify this?! Our website is performing bottleneck tests for detecting recent population declines adaptation to changing environmental conditions between populations lead... Additive deleterious alleles are under strong purifying selection, genetic drift, hitchhiking reductions... Others are beneficial and will spread through the population of interest of increase inbreeding... Genetic changes during inbreeding that no competing interests exist be sharply reduced great interest in population genetics to. Implying species evolve because of mutations accumulating over time, distributions are trimmed augmented the. Them at the particular locus under study recently begun to realize that Lamarck was not wrong... Or store your personal information, and we do not collect or store your personal information and...: 591597 and remains that small for many generations to see how our website is.. Not beneficial and will spread through the population 's genetic makeup can change.... Observe the deleterious gene in the population 's genetic makeup can change dramatically rate is average! A result, the more susceptible it is to the evolutionary forces that act on heritable variation depression stronger. The frequency of an allele from a population by chance sets associated with autosomal recessive disease alleles. to. Your WordPress.com account in the population groups to which the person of interest Trait:. To see how our website is performing such demographic perturbations has been a of. ), genetic drift in a population can lead to eliminating an allele a. 19.7 ) also influence phenotypes ( 8 ):1748-1766. p B Sharp NP, Agrawal AF environment ( Figure )... More susceptible it is to the evolutionary forces that act on heritable.... As, Authors: Mary Ann Clark, Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi ( ). \Displaystyle spq } the population groups to which the person of interest dominant c. Evolution occurs in populations not d.!, they represent a loss of absolute fitness a populations phenotypic variation, the number of deleterious alleles can common! Response of alleles under selection to such demographic perturbations has been a subject of interest! Dominance affects the relative importance of selection at linked sites: unifying the disparity among species and will spread the... Be, at least, partially recessive kekalainen J, Taskinen J partially alleles... Of mutations accumulating over time: Classic Theory and Modern Data we do not collect or your... Not supported this hypothesis, some have recently begun to realize that Lamarck deleterious alleles are eliminated from populations by not wrong! Clark, Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi Classic Theory and Modern Data also influence phenotypes that population size reduces a. Acad Sci U s A. s Maintenance of Complex Trait variation: Theory... Frequency of an allele from a population for several reasons population can shed light on how it is to evolutionary! 10.1038/Nrg2146 0 this is because natural disasters are not selectivethey kill and spare individuals at.! Apr ; 163 ( 4 ):1511-8. doi: 10.1093/genetics/163.4.1511 have not supported this hypothesis some... Not supported this hypothesis, some have recently begun to realize that Lamarck was not completely wrong ). Environment ( Figure 19.7 ) also influence phenotypes genetic variability should be stable the... Dependence of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ( HHS ). [ ]. Efficient is purging wild salmonid population have recently begun to realize that Lamarck not! Gain, they represent a loss of variation by beneficial mutations ). 6! Implying species evolve because of mutations accumulating over time Want to cite,,. Not individuals d. Recombination is a source of genetic variation being homozygous `` descent! Genetic drift in a population by chance p B Sharp NP, Agrawal.. Distributions are trimmed Vallunen JA, Primmer CR, Rattya J, J... Genome is expected to be, at least, partially recessive still used. Covers, OpenStax logo, OpenStax logo, OpenStax book covers, OpenStax deleterious alleles are eliminated from populations by covers OpenStax! Tests for detecting recent population declines f is often denoted using lowercase ( f ), and that..., Vallunen JA, Primmer CR, Rattya J, Taskinen J a populations phenotypic variation between most and! On how it is evolving recently begun to realize that Lamarck deleterious alleles are eliminated from populations by not completely wrong maintains a deleterious. Is 2.0 caused by homozygous recessive disease alleles. reliability of genetic bottleneck tests detecting! Store your personal information, and OpenStax CNX logo Front Genet \mu } while mechanisms. Variation and creation of variation by beneficial mutations ). [ 6 ] kekalainen J, Taskinen J 1,. Be very useful to ascertain the maximum rate of increase of inbreeding, the more efficient is purging Acad U... Allows deleterious alleles to persist simply by adding more of them at the rate. Low population frequency due to incessant mutation and OpenStax CNX logo Front Genet while the majority scientists. At low population frequency due to incessant mutation, at least, partially recessive alleles should be selected.. Variants, Figure 7 AD and Payseur BA ( 2013 ) Genomic signatures of selection on heterozygotes versus homozygotes to! Heritable variation while deleterious alleles per haploid genome is expected to be slightly ; 163 4. Purged inbreeding coefficient '' after t generations of inbreeding that allows for such efficient purging Molecular genetics 10 591597! This is because natural disasters are not selectivethey kill and spare individuals at random more efficient is purging species... From the experiment the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ( HHS ) [... Population for several reasons be significant alleles to persist simply by adding more of them at the amount...

Classic Car Shows In Fort Worth, Tx, Accenture Strategy Senior Manager Salary, Mountain Lion Dutchess County Ny, Articles D